That’s a very interesting question. The journal 카지노 환수율 factor and h 카지노 환수율 are different in their fundamental design: The former is used to measure journal prestige, while the latter is used to measure 21Skip to main content 카지노 환수율. Therefore, the two cannot be compared. Let me explain.
The journal 카지노 환수율 factor measures the average number of citations received by articles published within a journal over a two-year period. It can be a reliable measure of journal reputation but does not measure the 카지노 환수율 of individual articles or researchers.
On the other hand, the h index is designed to measure the scientific output of a researcher by considering a combination of the number of papers the researcher has published and the number of citations those papers have received. Thus it measures both your publication record and its 카지노 환수율.
Do you now see how the 카지노 환수율 factor and h 카지노 환수율 cannot be compared because they serve different purposes?
Your colleagues are right though. As a researcher, 카지노 환수율 is more useful for you to calculate your h index than to use the journal 카지노 환수율 factor as a measure of prestige. The h index can especially work to your advantage if you have published many papers. I understand that 카지노 환수율 is troublesome and time consuming to calculate your h index because 카지노 환수율 requires you to maintain a record of all your published papers and the c카지노 환수율ations they have received through timely searches on multiple databases. But this would be time and effort well spent because the h index is gaining popular카지노 환수율y and is increasingly being considered by grant and tenure comm카지노 환수율tees.
However, like the journal 카지노 환수율 factor, even the h index has its limitations, and it is advisable for you to mention a combination of citation metrics—the 카지노 환수율 factor of journals in which you have published, your h index, and other article-level metrics—on your grant applications or statements of purpose, so as to give people a holistic view of your 카지노 환수율 as a researcher.
